• Temat numeru
  • Artykuł pochodzi z numeru IUSTITIA 2(24)/2016, dodano 30 sierpnia 2016.

Pozycja sędziego w projekcie konstytucji PiS w perspektywie strasburskiej

dr hab. prof. UŚ Jacek Barcik
(inne teksty tego autora)

[hidepost]

21 CDL-AD(2010)004, Report on the Independence of the Judicial System Part I: The Independence of Judges, § 62.

22 CDL-AD(2008)039, Opinion on the Draft Amendments to the Constitutional Law on the Status of Judges of Kyrgyzstan, § 45.

23 CDL-AD(2005)005, Opinion on Draft Constitutional Amendments Relating to the Reform of the Judiciary in Georgia, §§ 6–7.

24 Wyrok ETPCz z 15.10.2009 r. w sprawie Micallef przeciwko Malta (skarga nr 17056/06, §§ 93–99).

25 CDL-AD(2010)004, Report on the Independence of the Judicial System Part I: The Independence of Judges, § 51.

26 CDL-AD(2011)012, Joint Opinion on the constitutional law on the judicial system and status of judges of Kazakhstan by the Venice Com-mission and OSCE/ODIHR, § 52.

27 CDL(1995)074rev, Opinion on the Albanian law on the organisation of the judiciary (chapter VI of the Transitional Constitution of Alba-nia), s. 3.

28 CDL-AD(2010)038, Amicus Curiae brief for the Constitutional court of „The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” on Amendments to several laws relating to the system of salaries and remunerations of elected and appointed officials, §§ 16–20.

29 CDL-AD(2011)010, Opinion on the Draft Amendments to the Constitution of Montenegro; Draft Amendments to the Law on Courts, the Law on the State Prosecutor’s Office and the Law on the Judicial Council of Montenegro, § 34.

30 Memorandum: Reform of the Judicial System in Bulgaria, ­CDL-AD(2003)012, § 15.

31 CDL-AD(2008)007, Opinion on the Draft Laws on Judges and the ­Organisation of Courts of the Republic of Serbia, § 61.

32 CDL-AD(2003)016, Opinion on the Constitutional Amendments reforming the Judicial System in Bulgaria, § 16.

33 CDL-INF(2001)017, Report of the Venice Commission on the Revised Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, § 63.

34 Ibidem § 63.

35 CDL-AD(2013)034, Opinion on proposals amending the draft law on the amendments to the constitution to strengthen the independence of judges of Ukraine, §§ 31–32.

36 Wyrok ETPCz z 24.5.2014 r. w sprawie Baka przeciwko Węgrom, skarga nr 20261/12.

37 J. Barcik, Postępowanie dyscyplinarne wobec sędziów w standardach Komisji Weneckiej Rady Europy, Kwartalnik SSP „Iustitia” Nr 4(22)/2015, s. 203–208.

38 T. jedn.: Dz.U. z 2015 r. poz. 133 ze zm.; dalej jako: PrUSP.

39 CDL-AD(2010)004, Report on the Independence of the Judicial System Part I: The Independence of Judges, § 32.

40 CDL-INF(1998)009, Opinion on recent amendments to the law on major constitutional provisions of the Republic of Albania, § 9.

41 CDL-AD(2007)028, Report on Judicial Appointments by the Venice Commission, § 29.

42 CDL-AD(2012)024, Opinion on two Sets of draft Amendments to the Constitutional Provisions relating to the Judiciary of Montenegro, § 23.

43 CDL-AD(2011)019, Opinion on the introduction of changes „to the constitutional law on the status of judges” of Kyrgyzstan, § 36.

44 Ibidem, § 24.

45 CDL-AD(2007)028, Report on Judicial Appointments by the Venice Commission, § 33.

46 Ibidem, § 35.

[/hidepost]