• Temat numeru
  • Artykuł pochodzi z numeru IUSTITIA 1(43)/2021, dodano 9 czerwca 2021.

Aktualne kierunki rozwoju władzy sądowniczej. Marsz Tysiąca Tóg rok później

41 Z jęz. angielskiego przełożyła Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska.

42 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers (CM/Rec (2010)12) on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, par. 26–29.

43 CCJE Opinion No. 1 (2001) on “Standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges”, par. 45; CCJE Opinion No. 10 (2007) on the “Council for the Judiciary in the service of society”.

44 Venice Commission Report on the Independence of the Judicial System, Part I: the Independence of Judges, 12–13 March 2010, par. 32.

45 The CCJE Bureau’s Report on judicial independence and impartiality in the Council of Europe member States (2019 edition), par. 20.

46 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers (CM/Rec (2010)12) on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, par. 27.

47 CCJE Opinion No. 10 (2007) on the “Council for the Judiciary in the service of society”, summary of the recommendations and conclusions, section A(b).

48 Ibidem, section D(b)(c)(d)(e)(f).

49 CCJE Opinion No. 1 (2001) on “Standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges”, par. 52, 57.

50 M. Bobek, D. Kosař, Global Solutions, Local damages: A Critical Study in Judicial Councils in Central and Eastern Europe, „Research Papers in Law” Nr 7/2013, s. 31.

51 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers (CM/Rec (2010)12) on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, par. 26–29.

52 CCJE Opinion No. 1 (2001) on “Standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges”, par. 45; CCJE Opinion No. 10 (2007) on the “Council for the Judiciary in the service of society”.

53 Venice Commission Report on the Independence of the Judicial System, Part I: the Independence of Judges, 12–13 March 2010, par. 32.

54 The CCJE Bureau’s Report on judicial independence and impartiality in the Council of Europe member States (2019 edition), par. 20.

55 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers (CM/Rec (2010)12) on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, par. 27.

56 CCJE Opinion No. 10 (2007) on the “Council for the Judiciary in the service of society”, summary of the recommendations and conclusions, section A(b).

57 Ibidem, section D(b)(c)(d)(e)(f).

58 CCJE Opinion No. 1 (2001) on “Standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges”, par. 52, 57.

59 M. Bobek, D. Kosař, Global Solutions, Local damages: A Critical Study in Judicial Councils in Central and Eastern Europe, „Research Papers in Law” No. 7/2013, p. 31.

60 Z jęz. angielskiego przełożył: Bogdan Jędrys.

61 Z jęz. angielskiego przełożył: Bogdan Jędrys.

62 Autor słowa te pisze 15.1.2021 r.

63 ABA Code of Conduct.

64 The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct 2002.

65 On Mr. Justice Story (12.9.1845 r.); reported in E. Everett (red.), The Works of Daniel Webster (1851), s. 30.

66 On Mr. Justice Story (September 12, 1845); reported in E. Everett (ed.), The Works of Daniel Webster (1851), p. 30.

Strona 40 z 40« Pierwsza...102030...3637383940